One explanation for these findings may be these majors, more than students in other disciplines, may need additional background for their paper assignments. We acknowledge that our findings are not generalizable to the full student college population. best paper writing site for fountain pens uk Silicon Alley Insider 22 January , at http: Respondents enrolled in two—year institutions were less likely than students in four—year institutions to use Wikipedia , with an estimated odds ratio of. Figure 4 presents a list of information resources used specifically for finding background during the course—related research process listed from most to least used.
Respondents who were majoring in architecture, engineering, or the sciences were more likely to use Wikipedia than respondents in other majors [ 11 ]. Listed in descending order from most to least frequently used resources. report writing service format cbse This group of students, we assumed, was likely to be acquainted with secondary research methods [ 6 ].
Buy college research paper zone write custom essay discipline in student life 2018
This finding suggests respondents from two—year institutions may have received more hands—on training about how to conduct scholarly research than at four—year institutions, given the curriculum and accreditation requirements in community colleges. In our logistic regression analysis, we did not investigate interaction effects between the different variables. Participants ranged in age from 20 to 30 years old.
As a whole, our findings present some opportunities for librarians, educators, and information resource vendors. The PIL Web site is located at http: As a whole, these findings suggest that course—related research is a complex and a multi—step process.
And the resources needed to complete these assignments may be unknown to them, too. A PIL research protocol underwent Human Subjects at University of Washington, the institution sponsoring the research, and at each institution in the sample. Head and Michael B. Few respondents 16 percent considered shared authorship capabilities as a reason for use.
- research paper help about tardiness of students introduction
- examples of dissertations zimbabwe
- amazon technical writer interview questions
- jnu phd program 2018
- how to write a compare and contrast essay between two characters
Custom essay services york pa
Lee Rainie and Bill Tancer, Respondents who were majoring in architecture, engineering, or the sciences were more likely to use Wikipedia than respondents in other majors [ 11 ]. Variable s entered on step 1:
Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion. One student in our sessions put it simply when discussing the value of Wikipedia: In particular, we investigated how Wikipedia fits into information—seeking strategies students employ for fulfilling course—related research assignments. phd no dissertation job Wikipedia , the online, peer—produced encyclopedia, is one of the most discussed topics on campuses today. How often do you use Wikipedia?
Research paper writing help quality pdf
Few students in our sessions ended their course—related research with Wikipedia. In the analysis, the independent variables for majors in architecture and engineering, arts and humanities, business, education, occupational training, and social sciences and a dependent variable of Wikipedia usage in our model. Laat uw reactie achter.
Yet our research provides a snapshot of which students may be more likely to turn to Wikipedia than others, too. These findings suggest the advantage of using Wikipedia far outweighs its perceived drawbacks i. In addition to the five statistically significant variables in our model, another six independent variables were not significantly associated.